top of page

Welcome to Crime and Justice News

Crime and Justice News

Supreme Court Justice Spoke With Trump Day Before Trump Filed to Delay Hush-Money Sentencing

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito spoke with President-elect Donald Trump about a former law clerk the day before Trump went to the high court in a push to delay the sentencing in his New York hush-money case, the Associated Press reports. Alito said in a statement that he took the call Tuesday afternoon from Trump at the request of his former law clerk, William Levi, to recommend Levi for a job in the upcoming administration. The two did not discuss the upcoming emergency motion, or any other court matters, Alito said. “I was not even aware at the time of our conversation that such an application would be filed,” he said in the statement. They also did not discuss any other matters that could come before the court in the future, said the conservative justice, who had faced calls to recuse himself from two major cases related to Trump last year after revelations that flags associated with Trump supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 were previously seen flying outside of his homes. Alito said his wife had flown the flags and rejected the calls to step aside.


Justices often recommend former clerks in high demand for top government and law firm jobs, but a direct call with a president appears unusual, especially because Trump has business before the court. Levi is also a known quantity to Trump, having served in the Justice Department during Trump’s first term as chief of staff to then-Attorney General Bill Barr. He clerked for Alito from 2011 to 2012. Gabe Roth, executive director of the nonpartisan group Fix the Court, described the call as “an unmistakable breach of protocol.” Or, as Roth wrote in a statement, “No person, no matter who they are, should engage in out-of-court communication with a judge or justice who’s considering that person’s case." Carrie Severino, president of JCN, a conservative group that has boosted Trump’s judicial nominees, said in a social media post that the call was a “manufactured ‘ethics’ scandal over a simple reference check” amplified to “smear” the justice.


Recent Posts

See All

Comments


A daily report co-sponsored by Arizona State University, Criminal Justice Journalists, and the National Criminal Justice Association

bottom of page